What was the significance of offerings in the Old Testament age?
Old Testament offerings expressed worship, repentance, and reconciliation. In a restoration-centered interpretation, innocent creation mediated fallen humanity’s approach to God, establishing conditions for forgiveness and spiritual growth. Abraham’s offering illustrates faith and responsibility. This symbolic dedication of created things also underlies tithing, which should express gratitude, stewardship, and sincere devotion.
The practice of making offerings was a central element of worship in the Old Testament, expressing repentance, gratitude, devotion, and the desire to restore humanity’s relationship with God. From the accounts of Cain and Abel to the sacrificial system established under Moses, offerings gave fallen people a concrete way to approach a holy God. The significance of offerings reaches beyond the outward ritual: people offered things of creation as a condition for forgiveness, separation from evil, and the establishment of a foundation of faith. These offerings belonged to a progressive work of restoration that prepared humanity to receive the Messiah.
The Biblical Foundation
The Old Testament presents offerings as an important means of worship and reconciliation with God after the Fall. Cain brought produce from the ground, while Abel brought the firstlings of his flock and their fat. Genesis records that God accepted Abel and his offering but did not accept Cain and his offering (Genesis 4:3–5). The account connects the offering with the person who brings it: the external gift cannot be separated from the worshipper’s relationship with God. God’s subsequent warning to Cain emphasizes his responsibility to do well and overcome sin (Genesis 4:7).
Under Moses, offerings became part of an ordered covenantal life. Burnt offerings expressed dedication and made atonement; grain offerings acknowledged God’s provision; peace offerings expressed thanksgiving and fellowship; and sin and trespass offerings addressed impurity and wrongdoing. These different purposes show that offerings were not merely payments for sins. They also expressed gratitude, consecration, and communion with God.
God explained the significance of sacrificial blood: “For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls” (Leviticus 17:11). The offering was therefore not a human invention for compelling God to forgive. It operated within a relationship and a means of reconciliation that God himself provided.
Nevertheless, ritual performance did not replace obedience or repentance. “Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams” (1 Samuel 15:22). The outward act was meant to embody an inward turning toward God.
Why Things of Creation Could Serve as Offerings
To understand why people offered animals, grain, and other material things, we must first consider creation’s original purpose. God created all things as tangible symbols and expressions of His love. The created world was intended to sustain His children, reveal His care, and provide the environment in which they could grow into mature, God-centered people. Its value was therefore not merely economic or practical: creation embodied gifts of divine love.
Human beings were meant to exercise loving dominion over these gifts on God’s behalf. Through the Fall, however, they came under Satan’s influence. The things entrusted to humanity consequently came under Satan’s claimed dominion as well. The loss of proper human dominion affected the whole created order.
Yet creation itself did not commit the Fall. Animals, plants, and the material world did not choose disobedience or become morally responsible for humanity’s estrangement from God. They suffered the consequences of being governed by fallen people. Paul describes that suffering: “For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now” (Romans 8:22).
Thus, although creation was caught within the consequences of the Fall, it retained an innocence that fallen human beings had lost. For this specific reason, created things stood closer to God than fallen people: not because they possessed greater personal dignity, but because they had not themselves rebelled against Him.
This explains the mediating role of an offering. A fallen person could take something originally created as an expression of God’s love and dedicate it back to Him. Through offering that unfallen thing, the person established a tangible condition for approaching God. What had been caught within fallen dominion was symbolically set apart for God, and the worshipper expressed a corresponding desire to return to Him.
The sequence is therefore important: God created all things in love; fallen humanity brought them under disordered dominion; creation nevertheless remained innocent of the human Fall; and people could offer these things back to God as a means of reaching toward Him. The offering set a condition for forgiveness and restored relationship. It did not mechanically purchase forgiveness, nor did the object by itself remove the need for repentance, faith, and obedience.
Abraham’s Offering and the Foundation of Faith
Abraham’s offering in Genesis 15 illustrates the importance of offerings within the work of restoration. God told him, “Take me an heifer of three years old, and a she goat of three years old, and a ram of three years old, and a turtledove, and a young pigeon” (Genesis 15:9).
Abraham divided the larger animals and laid their halves opposite one another. However, the account states, “but the birds divided he not” (Genesis 15:10). Birds then descended upon the carcasses, and Abraham drove them away (Genesis 15:11). God subsequently foretold that Abraham’s descendants would live as strangers in another land, serve its people, and suffer affliction for four hundred years (Genesis 15:13). Later, a smoking furnace and a burning lamp passed between the pieces, and God established His covenant with Abraham (Genesis 15:17–18).
Abraham’s failure to divide the birds was a mistake in the offering that had profound consequences. These details are providentially connected: the undivided birds represent an incomplete offering, the descending birds represent satanic invasion, and the descendants’ suffering becomes a period of indemnity, through which an unfulfilled condition must be restored. Abraham’s task was not merely to give valuable possessions to God. He was to establish a foundation of faith by faithfully fulfilling a symbolic condition. The significance of the act lay in restoring a relationship and a providential foundation that had been lost.
The Principle’s Clarification
The animals in Abraham’s offering represent a horizontal restoration of a providence that had unfolded vertically through successive generations. In other words, one offering was to gather together and restore foundations lost through earlier failures, particularly those associated with Adam’s and Noah’s families.
The three kinds of offerings also symbolize the three stages of growth through which Adam and Eve were meant to mature:
1. The dove and pigeon represent the formation stage, corresponding to the Old Testament Age.
2. The ram and goat represent the growth stage, corresponding to the New Testament Age. The ram’s symbolism is associated with Jesus as the Lamb: “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29).
3. The heifer represents the completion stage, corresponding to the Completed Testament Age.
These correspondences explain how Abraham’s single act could represent the restoration of an entire sequence of spiritual development. By offering all three kinds successfully, he was to establish in one condition the foundation needed for the further work of restoration.
Dividing the sacrifices had four related meanings:
1. It symbolized restoring the separation of good and evil represented by Cain and Abel in Adam’s family.
2. It symbolized restoring the separation of good and evil sought through the forty-day flood judgment in Noah’s time.
3. It established a symbolic condition distinguishing God’s sovereignty from Satan’s dominion.
4. It symbolized removing the blood associated with fallen life—the “blood of death”—and consecrating the offering to God.
Leaving the birds undivided therefore represented a failure at the foundational formation stage. Since growth and completion depend upon a secure beginning, the defect affected the offering as a whole. Satan could claim the unseparated offering, and the four hundred years of affliction foretold for Abraham’s descendants are the resulting indemnity period associated with their bondage in Egypt.
The lesson is not that God values ritual precision instead of love. Rather, in a providential task, faithful action must embody a sincere heart. A condition intended to express separation from evil must actually accomplish the separation it represents.
The Completed Understanding
Old Testament offerings were a condition for formation-stage resurrection. Resurrection means the progressive restoration of human beings from the spiritual death brought about by the Fall toward life in relationship with God.
From Abraham’s time, offerings occupied a central place in this providence; after Moses, obedience to the revealed Law provided its ordered expression. People participated through faith expressed in works: making offerings, observing God’s commandments, and seeking to live according to His Word.
This is called justification by works in the Old Testament Age. This does not mean that external deeds alone could force God’s acceptance or that faith was absent. Abraham’s faith itself is affirmed: “And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness” (Genesis 15:6). The point is that, in this stage of restoration, faith was given concrete expression through obedience to the Law and its prescribed offerings.
Those who responded faithfully could attain the spiritual level of form spirits, establishing the form-spirit realm of the spirit world. This was not complete restoration to God’s original ideal, but the level of spiritual development available within that providential age.
At the communal level, offerings and the Law helped form a people dedicated to God. Their ultimate purpose was to prepare a national foundation capable of receiving the Messiah. The sacrificial system was therefore not an end in itself: it was meant to cultivate repentance, faithfulness, holiness, and readiness for a fuller relationship with God.
The New Testament Age brought the possibility of growth-stage resurrection through faith in Christ, attaining the level of life spirits in Paradise. The offerings of the earlier age were thus an essential preparatory step in a progressive work of salvation, rather than the final fulfillment of that work.
The Spiritual Basis of Tithing
The same principle of symbolic offering explains the spiritual significance of tithing. A person’s material possessions belong to the created world and ultimately depend upon God’s gifts. Yet those possessions can become instruments of self-centeredness, domination, or attachment. Setting apart a portion for God acknowledges that material life should be governed by Him rather than by selfish desire.
The Old Testament declares, “And all the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land, or of the fruit of the tree, is the LORD’S: it is holy unto the LORD” (Leviticus 27:30). A tithe is a tenth, but its spiritual meaning extends beyond the arithmetic. The dedicated portion represents the person’s whole material life and the intention to place it in a right relationship with God.
As with symbolic sacrifice, the worshipper approaches God through an offering of created things. Returning a portion of what sustains one’s life becomes an act of gratitude, trust, and rededication. It expresses the desire that possessions—and the person who uses them—be separated from selfish or evil purposes and placed in God’s service.
This is why tithing is not properly understood as buying blessings or paying a price for forgiveness. Its spiritual basis is the restoration of relationship through a sincere offering. The outward gift should be accompanied by honesty, mercy, and responsible care for others. Giving a portion to God cannot justify misusing what remains.
Living the Principle
1. Recognize that animal sacrifice is not the practice called for in Christian life today. Offer your daily life to God through faith, repentance, and good works: “present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service” (Romans 12:1).
2. Regard creation and material possessions as expressions of God’s love. Use them gratefully and responsibly, remembering that the created world suffers under human misuse and should be cared for rather than exploited.
3. Practice the inward separation symbolized by dividing the offering. Examine your thoughts, words, and actions, turning away from self-centered motives and choosing honesty, service, and God-centered love.
4. Fulfill your portion of responsibility with diligence and sincerity. Abraham’s offering illustrates the wider significance of faithful action. Let that lesson encourage conscientiousness, not anxiety that every small error will bring punishment upon others.
5. Give with a heart of gratitude and rededication. If you practice tithing, let the offered portion represent your commitment to use all your resources well. Join material giving with justice, compassion, and care for those in need.
6. Pursue steady spiritual growth through formation, growth, and completion. Offerings find their purpose not in the loss of an object but in the restoration of a person: a life increasingly united with God and expressed through loving relationships.
These answers explain the Bible in the light of the Divine Principle, the teachings of Reverend Sun Myung Moon. Read about the author, Sun Myung Moon.
Last reviewed:
More on Restoration & Providence
Sources and further reading
- The Holy Bible, King James Version — Scripture quoted and referenced throughout the answers.
- The Divine Principle (full text) — The complete text of the Divine Principle, the teaching of Reverend Sun Myung Moon that these answers explain.
- Unification texts library (tparents.org) — Large online library of Unification texts, sermons and collected speeches, including the Cheon Seong Gyeong.
- Short video lectures in English — Playlist of short English video lectures presenting these same principles.